blog.dataforce.org.uk

This post is part of a series.

1. Docker Swarm with Ceph for cross-server files
2. Upgrading Ceph in Docker Swarm (This Post)
3. Docker Swarm Cluster Improvements

This post is a followup to an earlier blog bost regarding setting up a docker-swarm cluster with ceph.

I’ve been running this cluster for a while now quite happily however since setting it up, a new version of ceph has been released - nautilus - so now it’s time for some upgrades.

Note: This post is out of date now.

I would suggest looking at this post and using the docker-compose based upgrade workflow instead, up to the housekeeping part.

I’ve mostly followed https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/releases/nautilus/#upgrading-from-mimic-or-luminous but adapted it for the fact we’re running everything in docker. I recommend that you have a read though this yourself first to have an idea of what we are doing and why.

(It’s worth noting at this point that this guide was mostly written after the fact based on command history so I may have missed something. It’s always a good idea to do this on a test cluster first, or in a maintenance window!)

This all started with a comment I overheard at work from a colleague talking about a 2FA implementation on a service they were using.

“It works fine on everything except Google Authenticator on iPhone.”

… What? This comment alone immediately piqued my interest, I stopped what I was doing, turned round, and asked him to explain.

He explained that a service he was using provided 2FA support using TOTP codes. As is normal, they provided a QR Code, you scanned it with your TOTP application (Google Authenticator or Authy or so), then you typed in the verification code - and it worked for both Google Authenticator and Authy on his Android phone, but only with Authy and not Google Authenticator on another colleagues iPhone.

This totally nerd sniped me, and I just had to take a look.

This post is part of a series.

1. Docker Swarm with Ceph for cross-server files (This Post)
2. Upgrading Ceph in Docker Swarm
3. Docker Swarm Cluster Improvements

I’ve been wanting to play with Docker Swarm for a while now for hosting containers, and finally sat down this weekend to do it.

Something that has always stopped me before now was that I wanted to have some kind of cross-site storage but I don’t have any kind of SAN storage available to me just standalone hosts. I’ve been able to work around this using ceph on the nodes.

Note: I’ve never used ceph before, I don’t really know what I’m doing with ceph, so this is all a bit of guesswork. I used Funky Penguin’s Geek Cookbook as a basis for some of this, though some things have changed since then, and I’m using base-centOS not AtomicHost (I tried AtomicHost, but wanted a newer-version of docker so switched away).

All my physical servers run Proxmox, and this is no exception. On 3 of these host nodes I created a new VM (1 per node) to be part of the cluster. These all have 3 disks, 1 for the base OS, 1 for Ceph, 1 for cloud-init (The non-cloud-init disks are all SCSI with individual iothreads).

For a few years now I’ve been enjoying Eric Wastl’s Advent of Code. For those unaware, each year since 2015 Advent of Code provides a 2-part coding challenge every day from December 1st to December 25th.

In previous years, Myself and Chris have been fairly informally trying to see who was able to produce the fastest code (Me in PHP, Chris in Python). In the final week of last year to assist with this, we both made our repos run in Docker and produce time output for each day.

This allowed us to run each other’s code locally to compare fairly without needing to install the other’s dev environment, and made the testing a bit fairer as it was no longer dependant on who had the faster CPU when running their own solution. For the rest of the year this was fine and we carried on as normal. As we got to the end I remarked it would be fun to have a web interface that automatically dealt with it and showed us the scores, but there was obviously no point in doing that once the year was over. Maybe in a future year…

Fast forward to this year. Myself and Chris (and ChrisN) coded up our Day 1 solutions as normal and then some other friends started doing it for the first time. I remembered my plans from the previous year and suggested everyone should also docker-ify their repos… and so they agreed…

I recently acquired a new server with 2 drives that I intended to use as RAID1 for a virtualisation host for various things.

My hypervisor of choice is Proxmox (For a few reasons, Support for KVM and LXC primarily, but the fact it’s debian based is a nice bonus, and I really dislike the occasionally-braindead networking implementation from vmware which rules out ESXi)

This particular server does not have a RAID card, so I needed to use a software raid implementation. Out of the box for RAID1 on Proxmox you need to use ZFS, however To keep this box similar to others I have I wanted to use ext4 and mdadm. So we’re going have to do a bit of manual poking to get this how we need it.

This post is mostly an aide-memoire for myself for the future.

This post is part of a series.

1. DNS Hosting - Part 1: History
2. DNS Hosting - Part 2: The rewrite
3. DNS Hosting - Part 3: Putting it all together (This Post)

In my previous posts I discussed the history leading up to, and the eventual rewrite of my DNS hosting solution. So this post will (finally) talk briefly about how it all runs in production on MyDNSHost.

Shortly before the whole rewrite I’d found myself playing around a bit with Docker for another project, so I decided early on that I was going to make use of Docker for the main bulk of the setup to allow me to not need to worry about incompatibilities between different parts of the stack that needed different versions of things, and to update different bits at different times.

The system is split up into a number of containers (and could probably be split up into more).

This post is part of a series.

1. DNS Hosting - Part 1: History
2. DNS Hosting - Part 2: The rewrite (This Post)
3. DNS Hosting - Part 3: Putting it all together

In my previous post about DNS Hosting I discussed the history leading up to when I decided I needed a better personal DNS hosting solution. I decided to code one myself to replace what I had been using previously.

I decided there was a few things that were needed:

• Fully-Featured API
  • I wanted full control over the zone data programmatically, everything should be possible via the API.
  • The API should be fully documented.
• Fully-Featured default web interface.
  • There should be a web interface that fully implements the API. Just because there is an API shouldn’t mean it has to be used to get full functionality.
  • There should exist nothing that only the default web ui can do that can’t be done via the API as well.
• Multi-User support
  • I also host some DNS for people who aren’t me, they should be able to manage their own DNS.
• Domains should be shareable between from users
  • Every user should be able to have their own account
  • User accounts should be able to be granted access to domains that they need to be able to access
    • Different users should have different access levels:
      • Some just need to see the zone data
      • Some need to be able to edit it
      • Some need to be able to grant other users access
• Backend Agnostic
  • The authoritative data for the zones should be stored independently from the software used to serve it to allow changing it easily in future

These were the basic criteria and what I started off with when I designed MyDNSHost.

I run ubuntu on my servers, and since moving to Hugo, I wanted to make sure I was using the latest version available.

The ubuntu repos currently contain hugo version 0.15 in Xenial, and 0.25.1 in artful (And the next version, bionic only contains 0.26). The latest version of hugo (as of today) is currently 0.32.2 - so the main repos are quite a bit out of date.

So to work around this, I’ve setup an apt repo that tracks the latest release for hugo, which can be installed and used like so:

sudo wget http://packages.dataforce.org.uk/packages.dataforce.org.uk_hugo.list -O /etc/apt/sources.list.d/packages.dataforce.org.uk_hugo.list
wget -qO- http://packages.dataforce.org.uk/pubkey.gpg | sudo apt-key add -
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install hugo

This repo tracks the latest hugo debs in all 4 of the architectures supported: amd64, i386, armhf and arm64 and should stay automatically up to date with the latest version.

This post is part of a series.

1. DNS Hosting - Part 1: History (This Post)
2. DNS Hosting - Part 2: The rewrite
3. DNS Hosting - Part 3: Putting it all together

For as long as I can remember I’ve hosted my own DNS. Originally this was via cpanel on a single server that I owned and then after a while I moved to a new server away from cpanel and moved to doing everything myself (web, email, dns) - hand-editing zone files and serving them via BIND.

This was great for learning, and this worked well for a while but eventually I ended up with more servers, and a lot more domains. Manually editing DNS Zone files and reloading BIND was somewhat of a chore any time I was developing things or spinning up new services or moving things between servers - I wanted something web-based.

There wasn’t many free/cheap providers that did what I wanted (This was long before Cloudflare or Route 53), so around 2007 I did what any (in)sane person would do - I wrote a custom control panel for managing domains. and email. and it was multi-user. and it had billing support. and a half-baked ticket-system… ok, so I went a bit overboard with the plans for it. But mainly it controlled DNS and throughout it’s lifetime that was the only bit that was “completed” and fully functional.

For a while now I’ve been thinking of moving this blog to a statically generated site rather than using wordpress.

There are a number of reasons for this:

1. I can version-control the content rather than relying on wordpress database backups.
2. It renders quicker
3. I don’t actually use any of the wordpress features, so it’s just bloat, and a potential security hole.

I’ve seen Chris successfully use Hugo for his site and it seems to do exactly what I want, So I took the opportunity during the Christmas break to spend some time converting my blog from Wordpress to Hugo.

Actually doing this was a multi-stage process.